Words & phrases to dump for next year….

Posted December 31, 2009 at 4:33 pm by

An article about over-used & underrated words that should be dumped from the media’s (and our) vernacular has been posted by the Lake Superior State University department of words (I think). It includes “sexting” & “chillaxin” as well as “bromance” – which is a new one to me, meaning a male friendship.

It says there are too many Obama-things (like Obamacare & Obamanomics; better though, than Nixon stuff, which generally adds “-gate” to any scandal you can think of). I always liked “teachable moment,” but the LSSU folks say it’s being used to describe everything from potty-training to politics, and thus has lost its meaning.

I guess in the same spirit, I would suggest that the following be lost in the island’s lexicon:

“I’m just on island time….”: It was cute & quaint for a while, because it suggested we’re all so relaxed & into our retirement hobbies that we show up late for things. Now all it means is you’re so lame you don’t know how to make your computer beep to remind you to go places AND not make people wait for you.

Calling the mainland “America”: This is just a small thing, but if people keep saying it, the rest of the country will find out we’re trying to quietly secede from the Union. Our secret will be out.

The topless place on Shaw: OK, guys, it’s time to quit sending our hard-earned tourists over there just because it’s funny, when someone asks if there’s anything to do on the  island. And ya gotta quit telling them they can stay at the Motel 6 on Shaw, too. Especially on the last boat.

“It’s the way we do things here on the island”: Cool enough, but shouldn’t be said out loud by anyone who has lived here less than twenty years. Anyone who has lived here less than a year who says it must be beaten. (Editor’s note: I’m a pacifist. It’s that bad.)

“We”: Yes, it’s true – I actually know people who say “we” meaning only themselves, which is ONE person. I liked it when Mark Twain said, “Only presidents, editors and people with tapeworm have the right to use the editorial ‘we’.” Otherwise, it’s a bit pretentious.

“The City”: Someone on Lopez used this expression, saying, “Yep, next week we’re coming over to the City.” I asked, and she laughed & said, “That’s you, silly. Friday Harbor IS the City.” Well, that won’t work. When WE say the City, we mean Seattle, which actually IS a city. Or Bellingham. Or Victoria. Or Vancouver. Regardless, it’s clear to us.

You can support the San Juan Update by doing business with our loyal advertisers, and by making a one-time contribution or a recurring donation.


Categories: Uncategorized
3 comments:

3 comments...

  1. Hi Ian,

    While we are at it would it be okay with everyone if we just STOP ending statements in question marks!? It would make me feel so much better. Also, we don’t live ON Friday Harbor those of us who live here live ON San Juan Island and some of us live IN Friday Harbor. Friday Harbor is a town not an island. Please.

    One last thing while I am begging about lost causes. English is a wonderfully varied and flexible thing but I still have a wave of nausea when I hear someone say “on accident”. I suppose it is all the same but is the earlier version correct (“by accident” and “on purpose”)or is it just part of the wonderful flexible nature of English and no more correct or incorrect than(shudder) “on accident”?

    Comment by Sharon on January 1, 2010 at 1:32 pm
  2. O.K. so here’s one that really irks me, my mother and my grandmother, especially by news writers: using “me, him or her” instead of “I, he or she” when comparing your age, weight, height, good looks or any number of things. Think about finishing out the sentence or turning it around and see if it sounds right: “She is much shorter than me is” or “Me is taller than she” are incorrect. “She is much shorter than I am” or “I am taller than she is” are correct and therefore should be shortened to “She is shorter than I” or “I am taller than she.”

    Comment by Kristine on January 2, 2010 at 1:52 pm
  3. This article is a hoot! Thanks, Ian!

    Comment by Susan Herrera on January 5, 2010 at 12:15 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting a comment you grant the San Juan Update a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate, irrelevant and contentious comments may not be published at an admin's discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

Receive new post updates: Entries (RSS)
Receive followup comments updates: RSS 2.0