Response to Fire Chief Norvin Collins

Posted December 27, 2021 at 4:25 am by

In the Mail­bag today we have this let­ter from Nathan But­ler, Super­in­ten­dent and EMS Administrator…

We have seen the recent let­ter from Fire Chief Norvin Collins regard­ing our agency and merg­er talks. He bad­ly mis­rep­re­sent­ed our agency, and his let­ter is an object les­son in why we have opt­ed not to try again at merg­ing EMS with Fire fol­low­ing the unsuc­cess­ful Novem­ber attempt. Our com­mu­ni­ty can­not afford to have the high-qual­i­ty EMS ser­vice built up over years be dis­man­tled by some­one who is fun­da­men­tal­ly hos­tile towards San Juan Island EMS.

We would like to reas­sure the pub­lic that we will be there for you when you need us. Our aver­age response time for the entire island is well under ten min­utes, while response times in town are about six min­utes. This includes the time it takes to do a safe­ty check and leave the sta­tion. Our crews con­sis­tent­ly score high­ly in anony­mous sur­veys as com­pas­sion­ate, effec­tive, and respon­sive. We work effec­tive­ly with the Sheriff’s office to serve the out­er islands, as well as our medi­vac partners.

As we enter the new year, we believe the pub­lic has every rea­son to be proud of the Emer­gency Med­ical Ser­vices that they have spon­sored over more than two decades under San Juan Coun­ty Pub­lic Hos­pi­tal Dis­trict No. 1. We are proud to serve you and will con­tin­ue to do so with excellence.

Mem­bers of the pub­lic who want infor­ma­tion about the renew­al of the EMS levy under the hos­pi­tal dis­trict in Feb­ru­ary 2022 can go to www.sjcphd.org/ems, and are always wel­come to con­tact our com­mis­sion­ers or lead­er­ship with any ques­tions they may have (see https://sjcphd.org/contactus/board).

Sin­cere­ly,
Nathan Butler
Super­in­ten­dent and EMS Administrator

You can support the San Juan Update by doing business with our loyal advertisers, and by making a one-time contribution or a recurring donation.

3 comments...

  1. The fact that an unelect­ed employ­ee of the PHD has writ­ten this per­son­al attack on anoth­er gov­ern­men­tal agency and its per­son­nel is out­ra­geous. The inte­gra­tion of Fire and EMS is not about super­in­ten­dent Nathan But­ler and what he per­ceives as an insult. It is not about indi­vid­ual per­son­al­i­ty issues. What is IS about is what’s best for the cit­i­zens of PHD’s dis­trict; yes, those peo­ple who vot­ed for the PHD board mem­bers (not the appoint­ed super­in­ten­dent) to do what’s best for the whole com­mu­ni­ty. Just 3 months ago, the PHD wrote a Mem­o­ran­dum of Under­stand­ing in which they state that “a con­sol­i­dat­ed Fire and EMS ser­vice by a sin­gle agency…is in the best inter­est of the cit­i­zens”. They also state that “inte­grat­ing the two sys­tems into one agency max­i­mizes the abil­i­ty to pro­vide emer­gency ser­vices” and that inte­gra­tion “will be of sub­stan­tial ben­e­fit to the pub­lic, staff and vol­un­teers”. How was this true 3 months ago but now the PHDs employ­ee is stat­ing that they have no inten­tion of doing what numer­ous com­mit­tees, the year-long Cit­i­zens Advi­so­ry Group (CAG) and the major­i­ty of cit­i­zens have said they want. Are PHD board mem­bers mak­ing deci­sions — or are they allow­ing their employ­ee to do that for them? Know the facts before you vote.

    Comment by Rebecca K. Smith on December 27, 2021 at 6:16 pm
  2. One learns ear­ly in sys­tems analy­sis that the pri­ma­ry focus of an orga­ni­za­tion­al sys­tem is self-preser­va­tion. This tit for tat mud­sling­ing and selec­tive use of sta­tis­tics is not in the pub­lic inter­est. The com­bi­na­tion of Fire and EMS is essen­tial and should cer­tain­ly reduce the tax bur­den for rea­son­ably good ser­vices here. The con­tin­u­ing inabil­i­ty to resolve key issues has tak­en the fun out of dys­func­tion in our fish­bowl. Sure­ly the Coun­ty Coun­cil must step in to force medi­a­tion and nego­ti­a­tion to serve the pub­lic’s best inter­ests. Is this real­ly so damned difficult?

    Comment by Steve Ulvi on December 28, 2021 at 9:55 am
  3. PHD Super­in­ten­dent: It looks like you are includ­ing trans­port calls from the EMS build­ing to the hos­pi­tal or heli­pad right next door? I hope not, as the state audi­tor has for­mal­ly told you to not include trans­ports when you report your emer­gency response times. Trans­ports don’t count as emer­gency respons­es and they rep­re­sent about 30+% of your calls. Response time means the time from page to when you arrive on scene, and I can’t make your num­bers align with what I’m see­ing in the field. Hav­ing worked for EMS and Fire, I can say there is no way you can reach a scene at the Cape or the north end—and a sig­nif­i­cant minor­i­ty of our calls come from Roche Harbor—from the sta­tion in under 10 minutes.
    And the PHD does­n’t have a marine pro­gram and nev­er has. EMS made 13 trips to out­er islands in 2021 and you got there via Fire or Sher­iff staffed and main­tained ves­sels at no cost to the PHD, even when you bill patients and insur­ance for those calls. Call them what they are, which is out­er island calls, not marine respons­es, and be truth­ful to vot­ers that you can’t pro­vide this ser­vice with­out inter-agency coop­er­a­tion. Marine pro­grams are hard to run and the PHD has­n’t put in any of the work or mon­ey to do so.
    Be hon­est in your dia­log please; blow­ing smoke around response times, marine ser­vices, costs, etc. is disin­gen­u­ous, at best. Lack of trans­paren­cy is one of the rea­sons that most of the vol­un­teer first respon­ders in the dis­trict, self includ­ed, don’t work for you anymore.

    Comment by Adam Greene on January 1, 2022 at 5:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

By submitting a comment you grant the San Juan Update a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate, irrelevant and contentious comments may not be published at an admin's discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

Receive new post updates: Entries (RSS)
Receive followup comments updates: RSS 2.0