County Council discusses ballot measure that would permanently increase road levy

Posted May 9, 2022 at 12:14 pm by

Faced with the task of over­see­ing aging road and marine infra­struc­ture in an era of increas­ing costs, lim­it­ed rev­enue, and more extreme weath­er, the Coun­ty Coun­cil last week dis­cussed the pos­si­bil­i­ty of intro­duc­ing a mea­sure on the Novem­ber 2022 bal­lot that would per­ma­nent­ly increase the County’s road levy.

The addi­tion­al fund­ing would be allo­cat­ed to three key areas – sta­bi­liz­ing the County’s road fund, repair­ing the County’s pub­lic marine facil­i­ties, and pro­vid­ing ini­tial fund­ing for a lim­it­ed num­ber of non-motor­ized trans­porta­tion projects.

The cur­rent road levy sits at $0.56 per $1,000 of assessed val­ue for prop­er­ties locat­ed out­side of the incor­po­rat­ed areas of Fri­day Har­bor – rough­ly $280 per year for a home with an assessed val­ue of $500,000 – and is expect­ed to gen­er­ate $5.03 mil­lion in fund­ing for 2022. One pro­pos­al out­lined by the County’s Pub­lic Works depart­ment sug­gest­ed increas­ing the levy amount to $0.76, which would gen­er­ate $1.8 mil­lion in addi­tion­al rev­enue in the first year.

The Coun­ty is just com­ing out of an excep­tion­al­ly wet win­ter sea­son that required its Pub­lic Works crews to mit­i­gate dozens of road washouts, cul­vert col­laps­es, and mud­slides – like­ly a pre­view of the broad impact that chang­ing weath­er pat­terns will have on its infra­struc­ture in the decades to come.

The Coun­ty also has to con­tend with the fact that fuel tax­es, which rep­re­sent ten per­cent of rev­enue for the road fund, have been flat in recent years. And despite long-term efforts by the Coun­ty to stream­line oper­at­ing expens­es – such as reduc­ing staff and fleet sizes, sell­ing excess prop­er­ties, lim­it­ing cap­i­tal expen­di­tures only to emer­gency needs, and scal­ing back or elim­i­nat­ing deferred main­te­nance pro­grams – only eight per­cent of road fund­ing is cur­rent­ly avail­able for project work after account­ing for employ­ee costs, equip­ment, mate­ri­als, sup­plies, fees, and debt service.

Look­ing back as far as the ear­ly 1970s, Coun­ty offi­cials could not find an instance of the road levy hav­ing been increased. San Juan County’s pop­u­la­tion is near­ly five times larg­er today.

Giv­en the fund­ing chal­lenges fac­ing the Coun­ty both now and in the future, two Coun­cil mem­bers and Coun­ty Audi­tor Milene Hen­ley agreed at the May 3 Coun­cil meet­ing that any increase to the road levy should be per­ma­nent, not tem­po­rary. One of the sce­nar­ios out­lined by the Pub­lic Works depart­ment at the meet­ing had pro­posed lift­ing the levy amount only for a peri­od of six years.

“There is no hope that this is going to be bet­ter in six years,” Hen­ley said. “Costs keep going up, projects con­tin­ue, infra­struc­ture fails, so we need to make a per­ma­nent change – and per­son­al­ly I don’t think 20 cents is enough.”

“We need [the addi­tion­al fund­ing] just to keep our roads opens,” explained Coun­cilmem­ber Jamie Stephens of Lopez Island. “If we just added up our cul­vert repairs in the past cou­ple of years, we’re close to a mil­lion [dol­lars] right there. We need to bring the base up.”

“It should be a per­ma­nent increase. No doubt in my mind at all,” said Coun­cilmem­ber Chris­tine Min­ney of San Juan Island, who described the road issues as con­cerns of pub­lic safe­ty and access. “I tru­ly believe that the events of the last year, includ­ing road washouts and cul­vert fail­ures, are going to speak very clear­ly for them­selves when it comes to the deci­sion-mak­ing before the people.”

Coun­cilmem­ber Cindy Wolf of Orcas Island agreed that the improve­ments made pos­si­ble with the increased fund­ing were impor­tant, but ques­tioned the polit­i­cal via­bil­i­ty of increas­ing the levy amount. “I’ve been hear­ing a lot about the bur­den of increased prop­er­ty tax­es,” she said. “I agree with the assess­ment of what should hap­pen and what needs to hap­pen [in terms of] fis­cal respon­si­bil­i­ty, but I don’t know how to go to peo­ple right now and say that in a way that’s going to be acceptable.”

The Coun­cil also dis­cussed the impor­tance of explain­ing to vot­ers that the increased fund­ing would go first to nec­es­sary road repairs, then to marine infra­struc­ture repairs, and only after that point would mon­ey be allo­cat­ed to projects like bicy­cle-friend­ly road shoul­ders and road-sep­a­rat­ed trails – projects that are pop­u­lar among both islanders and tourists.

“We’re talk­ing about a bal­ance of deferred main­te­nance and dreams about what we can do in the future,” Wolf said. “I love the idea of more mul­ti­modal [trans­porta­tion options], but the clar­i­ty of what’s to be expect­ed is real­ly impor­tant, hav­ing just come through a year of dis­ap­point­ing peo­ple because trails were promised but not enough mon­ey was allo­cat­ed to them. We need to be a lot more trans­par­ent about what this is – hope­ful, yes, but with a real­is­tic expec­ta­tion of what’s going to hap­pen and when.”

Accord­ing to Coun­ty Man­ag­er Mike Thomas, the Coun­cil would need to decide on its approach by some­time next month in order for the propo­si­tion to reach the Novem­ber 8 gen­er­al elec­tion bal­lot, due to the amount of work required of the Coun­ty in order to meet the August 2 elec­tion fil­ing dead­line. If the road levy mea­sure makes it onto the Novem­ber bal­lot it would require a sim­ple major­i­ty of more than 50 per­cent of the vote in order to pass.

You can support the San Juan Update by doing business with our loyal advertisers, and by making a one-time contribution or a recurring donation.


Categories: Around Here
3 comments:

3 comments...

  1. “increased fund­ing would go first to nec­es­sary road repairs, then to marine infra­struc­ture repairs, and only after that point would mon­ey be allo­cat­ed to projects like bicy­cle-friend­ly road shoul­ders and road-sep­a­rat­ed trails –“

    This is a good approach. We don’t want to become like many cities that pri­or­i­tize noble, but often lofty alter­na­tive projects, while let­ting the cur­rent and most pop­u­lar infra­struc­ture suffer.

    Comment by Dave on May 9, 2022 at 12:56 pm
  2. Not only has the pop­u­la­tion increased since the 1970’s but I wager the amount of tourist traf­fic has also increased sig­nif­i­cant­ly. Per­haps we should also con­sid­er a means of pass­ing some of the bur­den on to vis­i­tors com­ing to the islands. Their traf­fic also degrades the roads. Some sort of increase in hos­pi­tal­i­ty tax­es direct­ed at hotel, motel, B&B, VRBO, AirBnB, and short term type rentals assessed direct­ly for road main­te­nance, that goes specif­i­cal­ly for that purpose.

    Comment by Jim on May 9, 2022 at 5:10 pm
  3. I think the prop­er­ty tax increase is not in line with the road use. Per­haps we need to increase the gas tax instead of prop­er­ty tax as that aligns bet­ter with wear and tear.

    Comment by Derek Hill on May 11, 2022 at 12:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

By submitting a comment you grant the San Juan Update a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate, irrelevant and contentious comments may not be published at an admin's discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

Receive new post updates: Entries (RSS)
Receive followup comments updates: RSS 2.0