Rick Larsen Town Hall

Posted March 26, 2017 at 6:31 pm by

Rick Larsen Town Hall meeting at Brickworks - John Miller photo

Con­gress­man Rick Larsen’s Town Hall on Sun­day at the Brick­works attract­ed just over a hun­dred res­i­dents from San Juan and oth­er islands. 

Larsen start­ed with com­ments about the fail­ure of the Repub­li­cans to end the Afford­able Care Act, with the heav­i­ly Demo­c­ra­t­ic crowd erupt­ing in applause sev­er­al times. He cau­tioned the group that while one bat­tle has been won, “the con­test isn’t over yet.” 

He cred­it­ed the grass roots activ­i­ty across the nation for the out­come. He had asked for peo­ple’s per­son­al expe­ri­ences with Oba­macare, and over 300 peo­ple in his dis­trict “wrote or called or did a video” about how they had been helped by the act, and he shared those reports with some of his col­leagues in Congress.

Larsen said the act had reduced the num­ber of unin­sured in the state from 14.8% to 5.8% and that uncom­pen­sat­ed care at St. Joseph’s Hos­pi­tal in Belling­ham, as just one exam­ple, was reduced from about $29 mil­lion annu­al­ly to $20 million. 

He then respond­ed to ques­tions for about an hour and a half before head­ing down to the fer­ry. Most­ly, it seemed, he gave the answers peo­ple want­ed to hear, but in at least two instances he did not. When he was asked about sin­gle-pay­er health insur­ance, as called for this week by Sen. Bernie Sanders, he said no, he thought it was more appro­pri­ate to stick with defend­ing Oba­macare, not to change in the mid­dle of the con­tro­ver­sy. And when he was asked about the noise from Whid­bey Naval Air Sta­tion growlers, he said he had called for a build­ing that would help reduce the vol­ume as they warm up. When a ques­tion­er said that would­n’t help with the noise while they’re in the air, he said no, but it would help his con­stituents who live on Whid­bey Island.

Larsen said his office will push back on Repub­li­can cuts to the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency and the var­i­ous agen­cies that help with afford­able hous­ing, and he will do all he can in Con­gress to over­turn the Cit­i­zens Unit­ed deci­sion of the Supreme Court allow­ing cor­po­ra­tions to spend unlim­it­ed mon­ey in elec­tions. He said the Fed­er­al Elec­tions Com­mis­sion “does a poor job” of enforc­ing the spend­ing lim­its that do exist and that he’s not sure how Con­gress can force it to do better. 

Sto­ry by Louise Dustrude

You can support the San Juan Update by doing business with our loyal advertisers, and by making a one-time contribution or a recurring donation.


Categories: Government
One comment:

One comment...

  1. I could write a mind-numb­ing­ly long com­ment detail­ing how our cur­rent mul­ti-pay­er health insur­ance sys­tem costs 18% of GDP com­pared to 12% in the sec­ond most expen­sive tier of devel­oped coun­tries; how that 6% dif­fer­ence amounts to a tril­lion dol­lars a year in admin­is­tra­tive feath­erbed­ding and price-goug­ing; how we get worse over­all out­comes (except for a few can­cers, at exor­bi­tant expense) than Cos­ta Rica and Slove­nia; and how med­ical bills are still the lead­ing cause of per­son­al bank­rupt­cy, post-ACA. Instead, I’ll give you with a cou­ple of real-life sto­ries, one from an Alaskan woman fight­ing breast can­cer under an ACA plan, and the oth­er from the daugh­ter of a French-Amer­i­can pan­cre­at­ic can­cer patient who received treat­ment from both Sloan Ket­ter­ing in New York and Hôpi­tal Cochin, a pub­lic hos­pi­tal in Paris. (France has a nation­al sin­gle-pay­er health insur­ance system.)

    * What sin­gle pay­er means to an Alaskan fish­er­man with breast cancer
    https://medium.com/@malena.marvin/what-single-payer-means-to-a-fisherman-with-breast-cancer-a539fc8894bd
    By Male­na Mar­vin, [last mod­i­fied] 24 April 2017

    * The French way of can­cer treatment
    http://blogs.reuters.com/anya-schiffrin/2014/02/12/the-french-way-of-cancer-treatment/
    By Anya Schiffrin, 12 Feb­ru­ary 2014

    Vot­ers need to ask them­selves why any moral­ly sen­tient, finan­cial­ly respon­si­ble human being would pre­fer to extend the ACA with a few dila­to­ry patch­es, band-aids, and tweaks rather than replace it with HR 676, “Expand­ed & Improved Medicare for All.”

    Comment by Peter Martin on April 24, 2017 at 2:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting a comment you grant the San Juan Update a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate, irrelevant and contentious comments may not be published at an admin's discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

Receive new post updates: Entries (RSS)
Receive followup comments updates: RSS 2.0