Letters

Posted September 22, 2021 at 10:09 am by

In the SJ Update Mail­bag today we have this let­ter from the SJC Repub­li­can Par­ty Chair, Daniel Schwartz…

State­ment on Vac­cine Mandates
San Juan Coun­ty Repub­li­can Par­tyThe Repub­li­can Par­ty is not anti-vac­cine:  it is for the right of a free and informed cit­i­zen­ry to make its own health choices.Never in our 245-year his­to­ry have fed­er­al, state, and local politi­cians imposed manda­to­ry vaccine/personal med­ical pro­ce­dure require­ments that force cit­i­zens to com­ply or risk los­ing their jobs, their rent­ed homes, par­tic­i­pa­tion in free com­merce, and free trav­el with­in and between states.

Cre­ators and enforcers of these man­dates call them­selves believ­ers in “The Sci­ence”.  Their Sci­ence is not the sci­en­tif­ic method, rather it is Sci­en­tism; favor­ing sci­ence that jus­ti­fies a polit­i­cal agen­da. Exam­ples of Covid Sci­en­tism and its hypocrisy are all around us:

  • Con­ser­v­a­tive ral­lies and church/synagogue atten­dance are poten­tial “super spread­er events,” but mass riots with loot­ing and arson, along with VIP and Hol­ly­wood celebri­ty par­ties are not.
  • Com­pa­nies with 101 employ­ees must man­date vac­cines.  The US Postal Ser­vice is exempt, as are mem­bers of the US Con­gress and their staffs.
  • Tax-pay­ing U.S. cit­i­zens must mask up and get vac­ci­nat­ed.  The 200,000+ ille­gal aliens tres­pass­ing our bor­der every month – at the invi­ta­tion of the Demo­c­rat admin­is­tra­tion — are not required to do so.
  • Peo­ple who had the virus and then recov­ered have pow­er­ful nat­ur­al immu­ni­ty, but they still are being required to take the vaccines.
  • Pres­i­dent Biden, in announc­ing his man­dates, made the absurd asser­tion that those who don’t get vac­ci­nat­ed threat­en the well-being of those who are already vaccinated.
  • The vac­cine is there­fore not as reli­able as the Sci­ence has told us. And, for some peo­ple it is dangerous.
  • Politi­cized sci­ence, and its hand­maid the media, have delib­er­ate­ly induced a state of pan­ic and fear among many vul­ner­a­ble Amer­i­cans, even though there are suc­cess­ful ther­a­peu­tics avail­able, the cur­rent Delta wave of infec­tion has peaked, herd immu­ni­ty is increas­ing, and death rates have sig­nif­i­cant­ly fallen.

These are but a few exam­ples of how un-sci­en­tif­ic and anti-sci­ence the man­dates are.  Indeed, the man­dates have lit­tle to do with sci­ence or health, but every­thing to do with control.

Many coura­geous cit­i­zens across our econ­o­my are risk­ing their employ­ment by resist­ing these uncon­sti­tu­tion­al man­dates.  Why would health care work­ers quit their jobs or allow them­selves to be fired rather than sub­mit to forced vac­ci­na­tion?  What do they know? Here in the San Juans, trans­porta­tion work­ers are push­ing back, which affects the func­tion­ing of our fer­ry service.

Our lives and busi­ness­es are dis­rupt­ed when fer­ries are can­celed due to the absence of required U.S. Coast Guard-licensed crew per­son­nel. That hurts all of us regard­less of our polit­i­cal align­ments. Nev­er­the­less, we, the San Juan Coun­ty Repub­li­can Par­ty, stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty with our fel­low cit­i­zens who still believe that the Con­sti­tu­tion and the Bill of Rights have mean­ing in the 21st Cen­tu­ry.  The answer?  Don’t can­cel lib­er­ty and the right of cit­i­zens to choose their med­ica­tions; rather can­cel these uncon­sti­tu­tion­al intru­sions, sup­pos­ed­ly jus­ti­fied by politi­cized sci­ence, into our per­son­al free­dom.  Para­phras­ing Ben­jamin Franklin; those who seek safe­ty at the cost of free­dom will get neither.

Con­stant fear-mon­ger­ing, lock­downs, mask­ing man­dates, and now vac­cine man­dates, have giv­en pow­er hun­gry politi­cians a path­way to a total­ly man­aged anti-Amer­i­can soci­ety.  Will we now be told that glob­al warm­ing is a health emer­gency requir­ing man­dat­ed restric­tions on the use of our auto­mo­biles?   Or told that own­ing guns is a pub­lic health cri­sis, jus­ti­fy­ing aban­don­ment of the 2nd Amend­ment?  The cri­sis of vio­lence is not a health cri­sis, it is a crime cri­sis caused by vio­lent crim­i­nals, who increas­ing­ly are not pros­e­cut­ed and are released and returned to soci­ety to com­mit more crimes.

Over the last dozen years, we’ve heard talk about “red lines,” which imply that oppo­nents cross them at their per­il.  The God-giv­en rights and lib­er­ties enshrined in our Bill of Rights make up our red line.  As Repub­li­cans, and as Amer­i­can cit­i­zens, we will nev­er allow our lib­er­ty to be canceled.

SJCRP

Capt. Daniel S. Schwartz, USMM Ret.
Chair, San Juan Coun­ty Repub­li­can Party

You can support the San Juan Update by doing business with our loyal advertisers, and by making a one-time contribution or a recurring donation.

4 comments...

  1. Unfor­tu­nate­ly this mis­sive is near­ly com­plete balder­dash using high­ly cre­ative con­fla­tion of non-issues, erro­neous con­clu­sions and unteth­ered, strained polit­i­cal rhetoric. Were it more con­cise and less hyper­bol­ic, dis­course could arise.
    In terms of vac­ci­na­tion against a dead­ly and invis­i­ble con­ta­gion sweep­ing the globe and dis­rupt­ing economies I come out as an Amer­i­can, polit­i­cal­ly unaf­fil­i­at­ed, and wise enough to know that com­mu­ni­ty rights often must trump indi­vid­ual rights for the greater com­mon good.

    Steve Ulvi

    Comment by Steve Ulvi on September 23, 2021 at 10:00 am
  2. Jacob­son v. Mass­a­chu­setts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)

    Comment by Mike Sato on September 23, 2021 at 3:02 pm
  3. It’s strange to read a polit­i­cal state­ment that goes around the barn to ask its sup­port­ers to be will­ing to get very sick if they hope to be called Repub­li­cans. Sounds Dar­win­ian, an entire polit­i­cal par­ty telling its mem­bers to become losers in the bat­tle of the sur­vival of the fittest. 

    This Repub­li­can state­ment also declares that covid is more a polit­i­cal issue than a med­ical one. To become a lover of free­dom, I too have to stop pay­ing atten­tion to abun­dant sta­tis­tics offered by med­ical experts who offer mere facts to prove beyond the shad­ow of a doubt that we put our lives at risk when we don’t wear masks and don’t get vaccinated. 

    This state­ment also sug­gests that it is patri­ot­ic to stand strong and unit­ed against some pie in the sky extreme bur­den of wear­ing a mask and get­ting vac­ci­nat­ed just to pro­tect loved ones, the phys­i­cal­ly com­pro­mised, the elder­ly, and the entire com­mu­ni­ty in which we all live. 

    Assured­ly, the writer will nev­er call me a patri­ot for the sin of tak­ing cer­tain small steps to keep from infect­ing peo­ple I don’t even know, includ­ing the espe­cial­ly vul­ner­a­ble who refuse to get vaccinated. 

    Comment by Jim nollman on September 27, 2021 at 6:08 pm
  4. Good pup­petry here, ref­er­enc­ing all the cur­rent Repub­li­can talk­ing points. The argu­ments are a blend of con­fused lib­er­tar­i­an­ism spiced with “Amer­i­ca’s busi­ness is busi­ness” and a kind of cul­tur­al resent­ment. He speaks of sci­ence, but there is no sci­ence in his screed. I would expect some­thing bet­ter from the local head of a once-great par­ty. The death of the Repub­li­can par­ty has been like watch­ing a slow motion train wreck. Can­not avert my eyes!

    Comment by Roger Ellison on September 29, 2021 at 5:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

By submitting a comment you grant the San Juan Update a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate, irrelevant and contentious comments may not be published at an admin's discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

Receive new post updates: Entries (RSS)
Receive followup comments updates: RSS 2.0